3.09.2007

Israeli-Palestinian Summit Meeting Set for Sunday



09 March 2007

Download
Israeli and Palestinian leaders will hold a summit meeting on Sunday. As Robert Berger reports from VOA's Jerusalem bureau, it is the most serious effort to establish a dialogue since the Islamic militant group Hamas won Palestinian elections over a year ago.

A Palestinian youth climbs the separation barrier during clashes with Israeli troops at the Kalandia Checkpoint between Jerusalem and the West Bank town of Ramallah, 09 Mar 2007
The upcoming summit will be the second in three weeks between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas. The meeting is taking place despite Israel's disappointment that President Abbas is joining a national unity government with Hamas, a group that seeks the destruction of the Jewish state.

Mr. Olmert says it is important to talk to Palestinian moderates like Mr. Abbas, who is also known as Abu Mazen.

"I will not cut my contacts with Abu Mazen. I will continue to maintain the bilateral track," he said. "I will meet with Abu Mazen, hoping to create the necessary environment that will be helpful for the relations between us and them."

However, Israel is not willing to open formal peace talks as long as Hamas refuses to renounce violence and recognize the Jewish state. Therefore, the summit will focus on humanitarian issues.

"We want to contribute to the quality of life of the Palestinian people living in Gaza and in the West Bank in cooperation with Abu Mazen," he said.

Mr. Abbas wants to go beyond humanitarian issues and open talks on a final peace agreement and the creation of a Palestinian state.

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat says it is time "...to move to a realistic political track, to move from words to deeds because creating the political horizons is the most important thing for Palestinians and Israelis in the region."

Erekat said the meeting is "very important" but added that he is not going to "exaggerate expectations."

US Official Urges NATO to Fulfill Mission in Afghanistan



08 March 2007

Download
A senior U.S. State Department official says the United States is pressing its NATO allies to fulfill their mission in Afghanistan. Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher says some NATO member countries are falling behind on their commitments because of restrictions on their troops to engage only in non-combat activities. VOA's Deborah Tate reports.

Richard Boucher
Assistant Secretary Boucher says about a dozen of the 26 NATO countries that have sent troops to Afghanistan did so on condition they be used only for humanitarian missions, not combat.

Appearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Boucher expressed frustration with such restraints at a time when NATO forces are battling Taleban fighters to head off a threatened spring offensive by the insurgent group.

"By and large what you hear from countries is 'we have authority from parliament to go on a humanitarian mission to Afghanistan, we do not have authority to put our troops into active combat.' We are saying that this is an alliance," he said. "Everybody needs to participate in whatever needs to be done. Because we had a Taleban resurgence, we have a mission to accomplish as an alliance."

Boucher said the United States continues to press its allies to provide the force NATO has committed for Afghanistan. He noted that France dropped restrictions on the use of its troops and is prepared to use its forces when needed.

Boucher said overall, NATO is doing well, but could do better.

Some Democrats expressed skepticism about progress made in Afghanistan. Senator Bob Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, said the Bush administration's focus on Iraq came at the expense of Afghanistan.

"I do not think all that much progress has been made. We have real challenges. Unfortunately, we diverted attention from finishing the job in Afghanistan when we went into Iraq," Menendez said.

But Assistant Secretary Boucher disagreed. He said there has been progress made in cracking down on the illicit drug trade, which has helped fuel the Taleban insurgency.

"They have eradicated some 6,700 hectares of poppy so far this year, whereas this time last year it was down in the hundreds. So there is much more eradication," he said.

Boucher also praised Pakistan for its cooperation, noting that the Pakistani government has launched attacks on training facilities and armed infiltrators and has arrested Taleban leadership figures.

He also said Pakistan has been an important ally in the fight against al-Qaida.

"Pakistan is enormously cooperative, enormously engaged in this fight," added Boucher. "No country has captured more al-Qaida or lost more men doing it than Pakistan."

Boucher added Pakistan can do more, and said the United States continues to work with the country toward that end.

Boucher appeared before the Senate panel to urge lawmakers to support President Bush's additional $100 billion request for military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

VOASE0308_Economics Report

08 March 2007
Meeting the Demand for Ethanol

Download
Download
This is the VOA Special English Economics Report.

A US fuel pump for 85 percent ethanol, 15 percent gasoline
What happens when a food crop becomes a fuel crop? This is a question many people are trying to answer as demand for ethanol increases. The issue is important not just to farmers and the energy industry.

President Bush began a Latin American trip in Brazil Thursday for talks with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on subjects including biofuels. One goal is to increase production of ethanol from sugar cane in Central American and Caribbean nations.

Together, the United States and Brazil produce more than seventy percent of the world's ethanol. In the United States, ethanol is produced mostly from corn, or maize, and is also imported -- with a tariff that critics call protectionist. Brazilian ethanol production is mainly from sugar cane.

In Brazil, about forty percent of all motor fuel is ethanol, also known as ethyl alcohol. Many Brazilians drive flex-fuel vehicles. These can use either gasoline or ethanol. They are so successful, General Motors has stopped making cars for the Brazilian market that only use gasoline.

In the United States, vehicles that run on pure ethanol are rare. But most cars can run on a mixture of gasoline and ten percent ethanol. Some states require an ethanol-gas mixture to cut pollution.

Yet the use of an important food crop for fuel has led to concerns. Ethanol now makes up about twelve percent of all corn use in the United States. At current growth rates, that could nearly double by two thousand fifteen.

The American Midwest is known as the corn belt -- that is where most of the nation's corn is grown.

Some people worry that strong demand may push up food prices and reduce supplies of corn for food aid or farm animals.

Fuel researchers are exploring additional ways to make ethanol. One possibility is to use the remains of corn plants left in the field after harvest. This material is known as stover. But stover protects against soil loss to wind and water.

Researchers are also developing "cellulosic biomass" -- things like grass and tree bark, which are normally considered waste.

The Department of Energy says the United States could produce more than one billion tons of biomass a year. But the technologies to make ethanol from biomass do not exist yet. The government says developing these new technologies could take five to ten years.

And that's the VOA Special English Economics Report. Archives of transcripts and audio files are at voaspecialenglish.com. I'm Mario Ritter.

VOASE0308_American Mosaic

08 March 2007
A River Runs Through It. No, Wait, Make That 250,000 Rivers

Download
Download
HOST:

Welcome to AMERICAN MOSAIC, in VOA Special English.

(MUSIC)

I'm Doug Johnson. On our show this week:

We answer a question about rivers …

Play some music by My Brightest Diamond …

And report about a new time change in the United States.

Daylight Savings Time

HOST:

This Sunday, March eleventh, most Americans will set their clocks ahead one hour. They will begin daylight saving time earlier this year. Faith Lapidus explains.

FAITH LAPIDUS:


Each spring, most people in the United States move their clocks ahead one hour because of what is called daylight saving time. The only states that do not are Hawaii and most of Arizona.

Daylight saving time provides another hour of daylight in the evening. Its chief purpose is to save energy by reducing the use of electricity for lighting. Many countries first used daylight saving time during war time. Britain and the United States used it during World War One. The United States also used it during World War Two.

After the war, many American states established some kind of daylight saving time. But this became confusing. So, in nineteen sixty-six, Congress established daylight saving time for the nation. It began the last Sunday in April and ended the last Sunday in October. In the nineteen seventies, that period was extended as a result of a fuel shortage in the United States.

In nineteen eighty-six, new legislation changed the start of daylight saving time to the first Sunday in April. It still ended on the last Sunday in October. Americans continued to set their clocks one hour ahead in the spring and one hour back in the fall. They remembered to do this with the expression: "Spring ahead and fall back."

Two years ago, Congress passed a law to lengthen daylight saving time by four weeks to save even more energy. That is why the time change will now begin on the second Sunday in March and end on the first Sunday in November.

Some businesses tried to stop the legislation. That is because computer systems used by banks, airlines and other businesses must be changed to recognize the new start date for daylight saving time. Any device that has an internal clock could be a problem and must be changed. Most internal clocks in computing devices are set for the old daylight time change.

Many companies have been working to reset electronic mail devices, personal computers and information-center computers. Most of Europe starts daylight saving time on March twenty-fifth. But most of Asia, Africa and South America do not observe daylight saving time at all.

American Rivers

HOST:

Our listener question this week comes from Bangladesh. Shamim Ahmed Sonju asks about famous American rivers. An environmental group called American Rivers works to protect and restore natural rivers in the United States.

Hoh River in the state of Washington
American Rivers reports that there are more than two hundred fifty thousand rivers in the United States. Combined, they flow for more than five and one-half million kilometers.

The largest and most famous river in the United States is the Mississippi. It starts near the northern border of the United States and flows through the center of the country for more than three thousand seven hundred kilometers. About two hundred fifty smaller rivers flow into the Mississippi. The mouth of the Mississippi empties into the Gulf of Mexico. At that point, more than sixteen million liters of water flow every second.

However, the Missouri River is the longest river in the United States. It flows for about four thousand kilometers. It begins in the Rocky Mountains of North America. It flows along the borders of seven states before it empties into the Mississippi River near the city of Saint Louis, Missouri.

Three rivers that join together in the north central state of Montana form the Missouri River. The water is clear there. But, as it moves east and south, the Missouri River turns brown as it collects huge amounts of dirt from the land. That is why many people call the Missouri River “The Big Muddy.”

Some people say the Columbia River in the northwest is the most beautiful river in America. It flows from the Canadian province of British Columbia into the United States through the state of Washington. The Columbia River is the largest river that empties into the Pacific Ocean.

Another famous river is the Rio Grande. It is the longest river in the state of Texas. It forms the border between Texas and Mexico.

Finally, American Rivers says that the oldest river in the United States is the New River. It begins in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina and flows north through parts of Virginia and West Virginia. The New River also may be the second oldest in the world. It is funny how something so old can be called new.

My Brightest Diamond

HOST:

My Brightest Diamond is a music group based in New York City. Shara Worden is the voice and songwriter behind the band. Her unusual music combines the spirit of experimental rock with classical music. The richly descriptive songs on their album, “Bring Me the Workhorse,” are filled with color and feeling. Barbara Klein has more.

(MUSIC)

BARBARA KLEIN:

That was the song “Dragonfly.” It tells about a trapped insect that asks Shara Worden to fly away with her. Many songs on this album have very creative and sometimes unexpected subjects.

Shara Worden of My Brightest Diamond
It might not surprise you that Shara Worden first trained as a classical opera singer. She has a very clear and controlled voice. Her parents were both musicians and always supported her study of music. Worden studied opera music in college before moving to New York City.

Shara Worden mixes music from the past and present. She still studies classical music. But she says she likes making popular music that is beautiful and pleasing to the senses.

Here is the sad, slow, love song “Gone Away.” It shows another side to Shara Worden’s emotional and powerful voice.

(MUSIC)

My Brightest Diamond recently traveled around Europe and America playing with Sufjan Stevens, a musician we told about in November. But Shara Worden has also been working on other projects. She has written an album called “A Thousand Sharks Teeth” which will come out next year. She says it has less rock and more of a dreamy, unearthly sound.

We leave you with the energetic beat of “Golden Star.”

(MUSIC)

HOST:

I'm Doug Johnson. I hope you enjoyed our program today.

It was written by Dana Demange, Jill Moss and Nancy Steinbach. Caty Weaver was our producer. To read the text of this program and download audio, go to our Web site, voaspecialenglish.com.

Send your questions about American life to mosaic@voanews.com. Please include your full name and mailing address. Or write to American Mosaic, VOA Special English, Washington, D.C., two-zero-two-three-seven, U.S.A.

And join us again next week for AMERICAN MOSAIC, VOA’s radio magazine in Special English.

3.08.2007

Microsoft's Gates Urges US to Seek More High-Skilled Foreign Workers



07 March 2007

Download
The chairman of the giant U.S. software company Microsoft is calling on the U.S. government to attract more high-skilled foreign workers to the United States to keep the country competitive in a global economy. Bill Gates made his comments in testimony before a Senate panel Wednesday, as VOA's Deborah Tate reports from Capitol Hill.

Bill Gates expressed concern about the U.S. immigration system, saying limits on the number of visas for high-skilled workers, bureaucratic delays in processing them and exhaustive security checks following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks are deterring talented foreign workers from seeking jobs in the United States.

In testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Gates warned that the United States could risk losing its competitive edge to other countries if Congress does not reform the immigration system.

Bill Gates testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, 7 March 2007
"Countries like Canada and Australia have been beneficiaries of our system, which discourages these people [high skilled foreign workers] with both the limits and the long waits, and what the process feels like as they go through the security checks," he said.

In the coming weeks, Congress is expected to consider immigration reform legislation, including efforts to attract more high-skilled workers and streamline the visa application process.

Gates said he believes it is possible to do background security checks without having the process become too burdensome.

He also called for ways to make it easier for more high-skilled workers to become permanent residents to help retain talent, particularly in the information technology, or IT, field.

"The IT industry I guarantee will be in the United States to the degree that smart people are here in the United States, and that is why I believe it is important to maximize that number [of high-skilled foreign workers]," he added.

Gates urged lawmakers to find ways to keep foreign students in the United States, saying if the country is going to invest in educating them, it should also benefit from that investment by encouraging them to work here.

He urged the federal government to invest more money in education and training, and in research and development (R&D).

"Federal research funding is vital," he explained. "Unfortunately, while other countries and regions, such as China and the European Union, are increasing their public investment in R & D, federal research spending in the United States is not keeping pace."

Gates suggested an increase of 10 percent annually in U.S. funding for research for the next seven years.

He also urged more teacher training and higher math curriculum standards. He said the nation should set a goal of doubling the number of science, technology and math graduates by 2015.

Egyptian Lawmakers Remain Upset by Israeli Documentary



07 March 2007

Download
Emotions remain high in Cairo, even after Egypt asked for Israel to investigate whether Israeli soldiers killed Egyptian POWs during the 1967 war. Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit and Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni met Tuesday in Brussels to discuss the issue and Leslie Boctor reports from VOA's Middle East Bureau in Cairo, on growing political outrage in Egypt over the allegations.

The Associated Press reports a statement released by the Israeli Embassy says Israel's ambassador in Egypt, Shalom Cohen, told Egyptian officials in Cairo the allegations are "totally groundless".

The claims have been flatly denied by Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, Israel's infrastructure minister. During the war he was in charge of the unit that allegedly shot the prisoners.

The allegations are based on an Israeli TV documentary that Egyptian media says shows the Israeli unit executed 250 POWs in the Sinai after the 1967 Six Day War had ended. The Israeli filmmaker categorically denies the allegations, saying the Egyptian media badly distorted his documentary.

The Egyptian media reports have raised a growing controversy that has dominated front page news in Cairo for the past three days.

A flurry of words were exchanged in Egypt's parliament Tuesday. Angry MPs described those involved in the allegations as "terrorists."

The issue has caused a diplomatic dispute between the two countries. The foreign ministery summoned the Israeli ambassador in Cairo earlier in the week to answer to the allegations.

Following his meeting with Israeli Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit warned the allegations would leave deep wounds with Egyptians, and urged Israel to act accordingly.

American University in Cairo History Professor Pascale Ghazaleh says the defeat suffered in 1967 still has a great impact on Egyptians.

"1967 was certainly was one of the most traumatic, if not, the most traumatic events for Egyptians, in part because the Egyptian government lied about what was going on during the war, and what was supposed to be a victory, obviously turned into a catastrophic defeat, so there is, in terms of a blow to national pride, the very important impact of 1967, " Ghazaleh says.

Ghazaleh says despite the peace agreements between the two countries, Egyptians are still deeply suspicious of Israel because of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

"As far as the POWs are concerned, there is also the idea that Israel has violated and continues to violate international law and human rights conventions with impunities, so there is the idea that double standards apply where Israel is concerned, " Ghazaleh says.

Following Tuesday's meeting in Brussels, Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said Egypt is prepared to deal with the issue on a regional and international level if Israel fails to address the issue.

Critics Say Understaffed AU Force Unable to Protect Displaced People in Darfur



07 March 2007

Download
The African Union mission, charged with monitoring Sudan's Darfur region, shoulders the enormous burden of providing security to some 2.5 million displaced people spread across a remote area the size of France. The AU has, at most, about 7,000 troops in the region. When the AU mission comes under attack, it is the displaced that suffer most.

Sudanese refugee woman hold a sign saying no to rape (File photo)
Critics of the African Union have long said the mission is unable to provide security to Darfur's millions of internally displaced people, known a IDP's.

As the conflict rages on, the AU's most vocal critics are often the IDP's, themselves, who say the AU simply cannot protect them.

On February 1, an unarmed African Union civilian police officer was shot dead and his vehicle stolen while on a routine patrol at Kassab IDP camp - home to 30,000 people.

The AU immediately ceased patrols to the camp, fearing for the lives of other unarmed officers.

Three weeks later, with the AU still unwilling to patrol, two Darfuri girls, ages eight and 10, were collecting firewood when they were abducted by three armed men who took them to an abandoned hut, made them remove their clothes and raped them.

When the AU resumed patrols, in early March, community leaders gathered to denounce the force for its absence.

"[For] more than four years, they have been repeating the issue of security but the situation is going from bad to worse," said Sheikh Tayyib Adam Nureldin. "Nothing has been improved. The absence of security is going to create more problems."

AU Civilian Police Chief Ahmed El-Sarafy sought to calm angry community leaders, but he did not apologize for the AU pullout.

El-Sarafy tells VOA the AU had no other choice but to cease patrols, after the murder of the civilian police officer.

"This man was shot for no reason at all. They could have just taken the vehicle and gone. I think there was a message behind this. They don't want us anymore. Killing someone for no reason has to mean something," he said.

After the officer was shot, rebels from the Sudan Liberation Army, who have not signed the Darfur Peace Agreement, claimed responsibility for the incident and offered to hand the killer over to the African Union and return the stolen vehicle.

But the rebels later changed their story, claiming that they had found the vehicle with the keys in the ignition.

They returned the car, but refused to turn anyone over.

Those who suffered most in the wake of the incident were women and girls who no longer had the security provided by AU patrols.

Women are often targeted by men they call Janjaweed members of Arab militia, widely believed to have been armed and supported by the Sudanese government, which used them as a force to crush a 2003 rebellion by African farmers.

Female officers from the AU civilian police interviewed the two rape victims, ages eight and 10 years old.

The younger girl covered her face with her scarf, as she spoke, and would only look at the ground.

She says she and her companion were raped by three men.

The 10-year-old girl said the men warned her not to tell her mother.

Her mother spoke to VOA about the incident.

She says she did not see the men but that her daughter told her they wore the uniforms of soldiers.

Village leader Sheikh Mohamed Abdallah Juma told VOA that, if the men are caught, they should be hanged.

But for now, it seems justice for the young victims may be a long way off.

Only a tiny fraction of rape cases in Darfur have ever reached trial.

The African Union, back on patrol, continues to struggle to do its job in the face of increasing threats.

Wednesday, the African Union reported that two AU peacekeepers were shot dead by former rebels of the Sudan Liberation Army, led by Minni Minnawi.

Minnawi signed a peace agreement with the government of Sudan in May.

VOASE0307_The Making of a Nation

07 March 2007
American History: The Space Race Heightens Cold War Tensions With the Soviet Union

Download
Download
VOICE ONE:

This is Phil Murray.

VOICE TWO:

And this is Rich Kleinfeldt with THE MAKING OF A NATION -- a VOA Special English program about the history of the United States.

(MUSIC)

Today, we tell about the race to explore outer space.

VOICE ONE:

On a cold October day in nineteen fifty-seven, the Soviet Union launched a small satellite into orbit around the Earth. Radio Moscow made the announcement.

RUSSIAN: "The first artificial Earth satellite in the world has now been created. This first satellite was today successfully launched in the USSR."

Sputnik One
The world's first satellite was called Sputnik One. Sputnik was an important propaganda victory for the Soviets in its Cold War with the United States.

Many people believed the nation that controlled the skies could win any war. And the Soviet Union had reached outer space first.

VOICE TWO:

The technology that launched Sputnik probably began in the late nineteenth century. A Russian teacher of that time, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, decided that a rocket engine could provide power for a space vehicle.

In the early nineteen hundreds, another teacher -- American Robert Goddard -- tested the idea. He experimented with small rockets to see how high and how far they could travel. In nineteen twenty-three, a Romanian student in Germany, Hermann Oberth, showed how a spaceship might be built and launched to other planets.

VOICE ONE:

Rocket technology improved during World War Two. It was used to produce bombs. Thousands of people in Britain and Belgium died as a result of V-two rocket attacks. The V-two rockets were launched from Germany.

After the war, it became clear that the United States and the Soviet Union -- allies in wartime -- would become enemies in peacetime. So, both countries employed German scientists to help them win the race to space.

VOICE TWO:

Laika in Sputnik Two
The Soviets took the first step by creating Sputnik. This satellite was about the size of a basketball. It got its power from a rocket. It orbited Earth for three months. Within weeks, the Soviets launched another satellite into Earth orbit, Sputnik Two. It was much bigger and heavier than Sputnik one. It also carried a passenger: a dog named Laika. Laika orbited Earth for seven days.

VOICE ONE:

The United States joined the space race about three months later. It launched a satellite from Cape Canaveral, in the southeastern state of Florida. This satellite was called Explorer One. It weighed about fourteen kilograms. Explorer One went into a higher orbit than either Sputnik. And its instruments made an important discovery. They found an area of radiation about nine hundred-sixty kilometers above Earth.

VOICE TWO:

The next major space victory belonged to the Soviets. They sent the first man into space. In April, nineteen sixty-one, cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was launched in the vehicle known as Vostok. He remained in space for less than two hours. He landed safely by parachute near a village in Russia. Less than a month later, the United States sent its first astronaut into space. He was Alan Shepard. Shepard remained in space only about fifteen minutes. He did not go into Earth orbit. That flight came in February, nineteen sixty-two, with John Glenn.

VOICE ONE:

By nineteen sixty-five, the United States and the Soviet Union were experimenting to see if humans could survive outside a spacecraft. In March, Russian cosmonaut Alexei Leonov became the first person to do so. A special rope connected him to the spacecraft. It provided him with oxygen to breathe. And it permitted him to float freely at the other end.

After about ten minutes, Leonov had to return to the spacecraft. He said he regretted the decision. He was having such a good time!

A little more than two months later, an American would walk outside his spacecraft. Astronaut Edward White had a kind of rocket gun. This gave him some control of his movements in space. Like Leonov, White was sorry when he had to return to his spacecraft.

VOICE TWO:

Later that year, nineteen sixty-five, the United States tried to have one spacecraft get very close to another spacecraft while in orbit. This was the first step in getting spacecraft to link, or dock, together. Docking would be necessary to land men on the moon. The plan called for a Gemini spacecraft carrying two astronauts to get close to an unmanned satellite.

The attempt failed. The target satellite exploded as it separated from its main rocket. America's space agency decided to move forward. It would launch the next in its Gemini series. Then someone had an idea: why not launch both Geminis. The second one could chase the first one, instead of a satellite. Again, things did not go as planned.

VOICE ONE:

It took two tries to launch the second Gemini. By that time, the first one had been in orbit about eleven days. Time was running out. The astronauts on the second Gemini moved their spacecraft into higher orbits. They got closer and closer to the Gemini ahead of them. They needed to get within six hundred meters to be considered successful.

After all the problems on the ground, the events in space went smoothly. The two spacecraft got within one-third of a meter of each other. The astronauts had made the operation seem easy.

VOICE TWO:

In January, nineteen fifty-nine, the Soviets launched a series of unmanned Luna rockets. The third of these flights took pictures of the far side of the moon. This was the side no one on Earth had ever seen. The United States planned to explore the moon with its unmanned Ranger spacecraft.

There were a number of failures before Ranger Seven took pictures of the moon. These pictures were made from a distance. The world did not get pictures from the surface of the moon until the Soviet Luna nine landed there in February, nineteen sixty-six.

VOICE ONE:

For the next few years, both the United States and Soviet Union continued their exploration of the moon. Yet the question remained: which one would be the first to put a man there. In December, nineteen sixty-eight, the United States launched Apollo eight with three astronauts. The flight proved that a spacecraft could orbit the moon and return to Earth safely.

VOICE TWO:

The Apollo nine spacecraft had two vehicles. One was the command module. It could orbit the moon, but could not land on it. The other was the lunar module. On a flight to the moon, it would separate from the command module and land on the moon's surface. Apollo ten astronauts unlinked the lunar module and flew it close to the moon's surface.

VOICE ONE:

Buzz Aldrin
After those flights, everything was ready. On July sixteenth, nineteen sixty-nine, three American astronauts lifted off in Apollo eleven. On the twentieth, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin entered the lunar module, called the Eagle. Michael Collins remained in the command module, the Columbia.

The two vehicles separated. It was a dangerous time. The Eagle could crash. Or it could fall over after it landed. That meant the astronauts would die on the moon.

VOICE TWO:

Millions of people watched on television or listened on the radio. They waited for Armstrong's message: "The Eagle has landed." Then they waited again. It took the astronauts more than three hours to complete the preparations needed to leave the lunar module.

First step on the moon
Finally, the door opened. Neil Armstrong climbed down first. He put one foot on the moon. Then, the other foot. And then came his words, from so far away:

NEIL ARMSTRONG: "That's one small step for (a) man; one giant leap for mankind."

VOICE ONE:

Armstrong walked around. Soon, Aldrin joined him. The two men placed an American flag on the surface of the moon. They also collected moon rocks and soil.

When it was time to leave, they returned to the Eagle and guided it safely away. They reunited with the Columbia and headed for home. The United States had won the race to the moon.

(MUSIC)

VOICE TWO:

This program of THE MAKING OF A NATION was written by Jeri Watson and produced by Paul Thompson. This is Rich Kleinfeldt.

VOICE ONE:

And this is Phil Murray. Join us again next week for another VOA Special English program about the history of the United States.

VOASE0307_Explorations

07 March 2007
International Women's Day Observes the Struggle for Equality, Justice, Peace and Development

Download
Download
VOICE ONE:

I’m Steve Ember.

VOICE TWO:

Garment workers in Takoe province, Cambodia, sing a song Monday during a campaign to celebrate International Women's Day. Campaigners marched for the right to food for all people living with HIV/AIDS, especially women and children.
And I’m Barbara Klein with EXPLORATIONS in VOA Special English. International Women's Day is March eighth. It is a day to observe women's struggle for equality, justice, peace and development. VOA reporters in several countries recently examined the situation of women. They found that for many, International Women's Day is a time to celebrate progress. For others, it is a reminder of how far they still must go to gain equality with men.

(MUSIC)

VOICE ONE:

VOA reporter Margaret Besheer examined the lives of women in Muslim countries. She reports that positive changes affecting women are coming slowly.

Mishkat al-Moumin works at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C. Miz al-Moumin says economic and social power are important to women's progress in the Islamic world. She says it is difficult for women to survive without men if there is no social or economic program to support them.

VOICE TWO:

Education is another area where Muslim women are behind women of other cultures. United Nations reports showed that in two thousand five, more than seventy-five million women in the Middle East and North Africa could not read or write. This is a large part of the Muslim world.

Mishkat al-Moumin says uneducated girls grow up to be unprepared mothers. They are unable to deal with modern problems affecting their children.

VOICE ONE:

Margaret Basheer reports that women are making progress at different speeds across the Muslim world. For example, in Saudi Arabia, modern change is coming more slowly. Women still are denied the right to vote or drive a car.

However, in other countries, women are beginning to gain a voice in politics. In Iraq, for example, women are playing an active role in government. In Kuwait, women voted and ran as candidates in parliamentary and local elections for the first time last June.

In Bahrain, the king appointed the first female judge last year. She joins other female judges in Jordan, Lebanon, Iran and several other Muslim nations. And a small number of Muslim women, including Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, have been leaders of their countries.

(MUSIC)

VOICE TWO:

A girl in New Delhi watches a campaign in December called ''My Strength, My Daughter.'' The Center for Social Research launched the campaign to bring attention to the problem of sex-selective abortions in India.
VOA's Steve Herman reports that on average, there are only about nine hundred thirty girls for every one thousand boys in India. Many parents like boys better because they carry on the family name. Girls may cause financial problems when they marry. Their families must traditionally pay huge amounts of money to their daughter's future husband.

Modern medical technology makes it possible for parents to know the sex of their child before it is born. Doctors use the method of ultrasound to see moving pictures of the unborn baby to make sure it is healthy.

But Sabu George, an Indian activist, says ultrasound is becoming "a weapon of mass destruction." Instead of using modern technology to save lives, millions of girls are being killed before birth.

VOICE ONE:

Using ultrasound tests to find out the sex of the fetus is illegal in India. But Corrine Woods of the United Nations Children's Fund says that has not stopped it from being done. Miz Woods says India's wealthier women have most of the abortions of baby girls. Researchers say one out of every twenty-five female fetuses in India is aborted. This is about one-half million each year.

Parents who cannot pay for ultrasound tests sometimes kill girl babies right after they are born. Baby girls who are not killed often die young because they are given less food and medical care than their brothers. They also receive less education.

VOICE TWO:

Corrine Woods of UNICEF says her organization and others are trying to educate people to get them to change their beliefs about girls. India's government is proposing to set up homes called orphanages to raise unwanted girls.

But some experts express little hope. They say the idea has been tried before and the girls suffered in many of the orphanages. Sabu George predicts that even with political and legal measures, changes in beliefs will be slow.

Social scientists warn about the effects of the situation. They say it is not good for a society to have too many young men and not enough women for them to marry. This can result in more crime and violence.

VOICE ONE:

Similar warnings are being heard about the growing population imbalance in China. Male children have traditionally been expected to take care of their aged parents. Poor farmers, especially, want sons because of a limited social security system.

But the National Population and Family Planning Commission recently called the gender imbalance a "hidden threat" to social order. Still, its director said China needs to continue to limit family size to keep the world's largest population from growing out of control.

(MUSIC)

VOICE TWO:

Seven years ago, the United Nations set its Millennium Development Goals. Education for all children by the year twenty fifteen was one of the goals. VOA's Rosanne Skirble reports that some gains have been made toward reaching that goal. However, much more needs to be done, especially in Africa.

Faty Seye is a twenty-four-year-old woman from Dakar, Senegal. She did not finish high school. But she learned car repair skills free of charge in a program run by a local organization, the Young Women's Shelter. The group works with homeless girls, girls who have dropped out of school and single mothers. It offers classroom studies and hands-on experience.

Faty Seye was trained to be an automobile mechanic. She was not concerned that women rarely do this kind of work. She says that as long as you love your job, you will do it well.

VOICE ONE:

In southern Africa, girls are more than half of the thirty-eight million children who are not in school. Girls are usually kept at home to work and to care for younger brothers and sisters or sick parents. Carolyn Bartholomew heads the Basic Education Coalition, based in Washington, D.C.

It is a coalition of international development groups. She says keeping girls in school is good for a number of reasons. She says the results include healthier children and stronger families. In addition, educated mothers are more likely to educate their own children so the positive results extend into the future.

VOICE TWO:

In East Africa, girls growing up among the Maasai tribes of Kenya face cultural traditions that stand in the way of an education. Traditional values force many girls to accept arranged marriages when they are very young. Many girls are also forced to have their sex organs cut. Opponents of this tradition call it female genital mutilation.

However, some girls, such as fourteen-year-old Evelyne Meitiaki, are able to attend the AIC Primary School near a small town south of Nairobi. Her two older sisters brought her to this school when she was five years old. The school's rescue center has seventy-five girls. They live at the school and take classes through high school. A nongovernmental organization in Kenya supports the school.

VOICE ONE:

Evelyne says she wants to become a lawyer. She says she wants to fight against female genital mutilation and arranged marriages of young girls. However, the Maasai see these "rescued girls" as rebels and a threat to their traditional way of life. A teacher at the school, Catherine Korrompoi says Maasai culture must change in order to survive. She says these girls will change the whole community.

(MUSIC)

VOICE TWO:

In Latin America, more women are taking important jobs in government. There are female defense ministers in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Uruguay. Chile also has a female president.

VOA reporter Mike Bowman talked to Lorena Escudero, the defense minister of Ecuador. President Rafael Correa appointed her in January, after the former defense minister was killed in a helicopter crash. Miz Escudero says her appointment is one sign of positive change for women in Latin America. She says all women should fight and not give up. There are unlimited chances for success in the world, she says, and women should be part of it.

VOICE ONE:

Our program was written by Shelley Gollust and produced by Mario Ritter. I’m Steve Ember.

VOICE TWO:

And I’m Barbara Klein. You can read and listen to this program at voaspecialenglish.com. Join us again next week for EXPLORATIONS in VOA Special English.

VOASE0307_Education Report

07 March 2007
Coming to Terms With Academic Titles at US Colleges

Download
Download
This is the VOA Special English Education Report.

Not all college teachers are professors. In fact, not even all professors are full professors. Many are assistant or associate or adjunct professors. This week in our Foreign Student Series, we sort out academic titles at American colleges and universities.

Professors usually need a doctorate degree. But sometimes a school may offer positions to people who have not yet received their doctorate.

Such a person would be called an instructor until the degree has been completed. After that, the instructor could become an assistant professor. Assistant professors do not have tenure.

A person with tenure cannot be easily dismissed. Such appointments are permanent. Teachers and researchers who are hired with the understanding that they will seek tenure are said to be "on the tenure track." Assistant professor is the first job on this path.

Assistant professors generally have five to seven years to gain tenure. During this time, other faculty members study the person's work. If tenure is denied, then the assistant professor usually has a year to find another job.

Candidates for tenure may feel great pressure to get research published. "Publish or perish" is the traditional saying.

An assistant professor who receives tenure becomes an associate professor. An associate professor may later be appointed a full professor.

Assistant, associate and full professors perform many duties. They teach classes. They advise students. And they carry out research. They also serve on committees and take part in other activities.

Other faculty members are not expected to do all these jobs. They are not on a tenure track. Instead, they might be in adjunct or visiting positions. A visiting professor has a job at one school but works at another for a period of time. An adjunct professor is also a limited or part-time position, to do research or teach classes. Adjunct professors have a doctorate.

Another position is that of lecturer. Lecturers teach classes, but they may or may not have a doctorate.

And that's the VOA Special English Education Report, written by Nancy Steinbach. This is the twenty-seventh week of our Foreign Student Series on higher education in the United States -- with more to come.

Our series is archived with audio files and transcripts at voaspecialenglish.com. And our e-mail address is special@voanews.com. If you write to us, please be sure to include your name and country. I'm Steve Ember.

3.07.2007

US Acts to Counter Venezuela's Clout in Latin America



07 March 2007

Download
President Bush's latest aid package for Latin America is aimed at combating poverty and strengthening democracy across the region. But some regional experts say the plan, announced just days before Mr. Bush's trip to Latin America, is designed to blunt Venezuela's growing clout on the continent.

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez before the United Nations General Assembly, Wednesday Sept. 20, 2006
The announcement of the aid package showed a new side to the administration's relation with the region, which has typically focused on strengthening business ties and trade agreements. It also comes at a time when a key U.S. opponent, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, is seeking to increase his nation's outreach on the continent.

Since taking office in 1999, President Chavez has vowed to improve social conditions for the poor majority in his country through a series of anti-poverty, health and education programs. Supporters say the programs have been a success in the oil-rich nation, partly thanks to a rise in oil prices around the globe.

Jorge Castaneda, former foreign affairs minister for Mexico, says the relative success of the Venezuelan programs is unique to Latin America.

"You have a situation now where they have a social policy which means taking basic social services to the urban poor in Latin America," he said. "Health, education, water, controlled prices. It can't last forever, but it's a lot better than what many of these neighbors have elsewhere in Latin America."

Castaneda says some of these Venezuelan programs are modeled after similar ones in Cuba. The Communist government in Cuba has long prided itself on education, health and literacy programs for residents on the island, as well as initiatives to send teams of doctors to emergency zones around the world.

And just like Cuba, Castaneda says Venezuela is looking to export its social program to countries, such as Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua. At the same time, Caracas has lent its financial backing to Argentina to issue a joint bond for $1.5 billion.

Venezuela's new efforts come at a time of major changes in the international aid and finance sectors, says Albert Fishlow, director of the Institute for Latin American studies at Columbia University. He says there are more possible sources of finance than ever before. The needs in Latin America, he says, have changed.

"You don't have much need, I would argue, for massive flows," he said. "And that is for the good, because every time the United States promises it's going to do something, it never does. And the most obvious and saddest case is the Millennium Project."

Fishlow and others have criticized the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation, saying it has been too slow to fulfill its promises. The agency was created in 2004 to increase U.S. aid spending by $5 billion over the following year.

Officials at the Millennium Corporation say they have already signed deals worth more than $1 billion with 11 nations, including El Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras. And days before launching a tour of Latin American nations, President Bush unveiled a new set of aid spending, especially targeted to Latin America.

President Bush
"In the coming years, these agreements will provide a total of $885 million a year in new aid, so long as these countries continue to meet the standards of the Millennium Challenge program."

Under the terms of a Millennium Challenge agreement, recipient nations must show a commitment to certain policies, such as political and economic freedom, anti-corruption measures and other reforms.

Similar conditions have been common with loans from the International Monetary Fund and other Western agencies. In contrast, Venezuela has not tied its foreign spending to political conditions or promised reforms, says Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington.

"So the Venezuelan government is providing an alternative source of financing, but it's not even trying to tell any of these countries what to do," he said.

Weisbrot says the absence of conditions makes Venezuela's spending attractive to other nations in the region. At the time, he said it represents a threat to U.S. leaders who fear losing influence to Venezuela's President Chavez and leftist leaders in the region.

"They do think these countries are pursuing reckless, populist policies, and they will eventually learn their lessons," he added. "In the meantime, the loss of influence for the United States is a major concern to the leaders of the Bush administration, the Congress, and most of the think tanks here."

During his Latin America tour, President Bush is expected to seek support from Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to help counter Venezuela's influence. But experts say that Brazil views both the United States and Venezuela as important partners, and is unlikely to take sides against the other now.

Libby Guilty of Lying in CIA Leak Case



06 March 2007

Download
Former White House aide Lewis Libby was found guilty Tuesday on four of five counts of lying, perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with the investigation into the leak of a covert CIA officer's identity in 2003. Vice President Dick Cheney said he was "very disappointed" with the verdict. National correspondent Jim Malone has details from Washington.

Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, left, accompanied by his attorneys, prepares to meet reporters outside federal court after jury reached its verdict in Washington, 6 March 2007

Libby is a former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney and at one time was one of the most powerful White House staffers in Washington.

Libby was convicted on four of five counts of either lying to or misleading FBI investigators as part of the investigation into who leaked the identity of former covert CIA officer Valerie Plame.

Plame's CIA identity was revealed in a newspaper column in 2003. Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald launched an investigation into whether Plame's identity was leaked as part of a White House effort to discredit her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson. Wilson had accused the Bush administration of distorting intelligence in the run-up to the war in Iraq.

Libby did not speak to reporters after the verdict. But his attorney, Ted Wells, said he was disappointed in the jury's decision.

"We intend to file a motion for a new trial and, if that is denied, we will appeal the conviction and we have every confidence that ultimately Mr. Libby will be vindicated," he said. "We believe, as we said at the time of his indictment, that he is totally innocent, totally innocent, and that he did not do anything wrong."

Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald also spoke to reporters outside the court following the verdict.

"The jury was obviously convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had lied and obstructed justice in a serious matter," he said. "The results are actually sad. It is sad that we had a situation where a high level official, a person who worked in the office of the vice president, obstructed justice and lied under oath. We wished that that had not happened, but it did."

Prosecutors said Libby knew of Valerie Plame's CIA connection from Vice President Cheney and others in the administration. Libby's attorneys countered that he had a bad memory and had misremembered his conversations with journalists, some of whom were called to testify in the case.

The only juror who spoke to reporters was Denis Collins. Collins said jurors did not believe Libby's faulty memory defense, but Collins also said there was sympathy for Libby on the jury.

Former White House aide Lewis 'Scooter' Libby arrives at Federal Court in Washington, 2 March 2007

"Now having said that, I will say that there was a tremendous amount of sympathy for Mr. Libby on the jury," he explained. "It was said a number of times, what are we doing with this guy here? Where is [presidential adviser Karl] Rove? Where are these other guys? We are not saying that we did not think Mr. Libby was guilty of the things we found him guilty of. But it seemed like he was, the way Mr. Wells put it, he was the fall guy."

Prosecutor Fitzgerald said no additional charges will be filed in connection with the four-year-old investigation, meaning that no one will be charged with the original leak of Valerie Plame's CIA identity, which eventually made its way into the press.

At the White House, Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino said President Bush had watched news of the Libby verdict on a television in the Oval Office and is saddened for Libby and his family.

"The best thing I can offer you right now is what the president's reaction was, he respected the verdict, he respects the jury, and we are just not going to be able to comment beyond it," she said.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid welcomed the Libby verdict, saying it was about time someone in the Bush administration was held accountable for manipulating pre-war intelligence on Iraq and discrediting war critics.

Libby is the highest-ranking former White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-Contra scandal under President Ronald Reagan in the 1980's.

Libby could face a lengthy prison term in the wake of the convictions on four of the five counts against him. He will remain free on bail until a pre-sentencing hearing in May.

Libby, 56, could face up to 30 years in prison and more than $1 million in fines.

VOASE0307_Health Report

07 March 2007
New Malaria Drug Coming to Africa Is Low Cost, Easy to Take

Download
Download
This is the VOA Special English Health Report.

A boy waits to be tested for malaria in Mozambique in 2000
Malaria infects as many as five hundred million people worldwide each year and kills more than one million of them. The ones who die are mostly children in southern Africa -- another one every thirty seconds, says the World Health Organization.

Malaria drugs have been available for many years. Until now, however, they have been costly for the poor and not very easy to give to children.

But last week a big drug company and an international campaign announced a new antimalarial that is low cost and easy to take. The drug maker Sanofi-Aventis of France is working in partnership with the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative.

The new product is called A-S-A-Q. It combines what experts say are two of the best drugs for malaria: artesunate and amodiaquine. Officials say ASAQ will soon be available throughout Africa south of the Sahara.

Combinations of drugs are used to treat diseases like malaria, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. This is because it is easier for organisms to develop resistance to a single drug.

Current malaria treatments require adults to take as many as eight pills a day. And they often have to divide pills to administer a smaller amount to children.

ASAQ combines the medicines into one daily pill for children and two pills for adults. The medicine is taken for three days. Doctors say the simpler the treatment, the more likely people are to take their medicine.

Sanofi-Aventis has promised to sell ASAQ on a "no profit-no loss" basis to the poorest patients. The full treatment cost for older children and adults will be less than a dollar. The cost for a child under the age of five will be less than half a dollar.

Sanofi-Aventis has also made an unusual decision not to seek patent protections for ASAQ. That means other companies are free to make their own versions to sell at even lower prices.

Five organizations including the French group Medecins Sans Frontieres, Doctors Without Borders, established the initiative four years ago. The aim is to work with major drug companies to create low-cost drugs for diseases that are common in poor countries. ASAQ is the first product to be launched.

And that's the VOA Special English Health Report, written by Caty Weaver. Our reports are online with transcripts at voaspecialenglish.com. I'm Barbara Klein.

3.06.2007

US Veterans, Family Members Testify on Military Medical Care



05 March 2007

Download
US lawmakers are pledging strong action in the wake of the latest revelations regarding poor conditions wounded soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan have faced at a key Army medical hospital. VOA's Dan Robinson reports on an unusual public hearing at the facility, steps under way in Congress and what President Bush has said about the situation.

The scandal over unsanitary and other sub-standard conditions at a building at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center has already resulted in the dismissal of the secretary of the Army by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the replacement of the head of the facility.

However, House and Senate lawmakers want more done. They are demanding the creation of an independent commission and a wider government probe into bureaucratic and other problems affecting veterans.

The first in a series of hearings took place Monday when members of a House subcommittee went to the Walter Reed facility.

"This is absolutely the wrong way to treat our troops, and serious reforms need to happen immediately," said Democratic Congressman John Tierney.

Spec. Jeremy Duncan and Annette McLeod, wife of Cpl. Wendell McLeod, testify before a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee hearing at Walter Reed Medical Center, 5 March 2007
Wounded veterans and family members testified about tangled bureaucracy slowing or preventing urgently needed care.

Jeremy Duncan, a U.S. Army Specialist receiving treatment at Walter Reed for wounds suffered in an explosion in Iraq, testified about conditions he saw in a building there.

"There is no way they couldn't have known," he said. "Everybody had to have known somewhere, if they wanted to actually look at it or pay attention or believe it."

Staft Sgt. John Shannon testifies before House subcommittee at Walter Reed Medical Center in Washington, 5 March 2007
U.S. Army Staff Sergeant John Shannon, who lost an eye after being shot during a battle near the Iraqi city of Ramadi, says system-wide reforms are needed.

"A system that fires people down the chain, once again in my opinion is indicative of a system that is trying to protect itself whether it fixes the problem or not, and in my opinion [is] clearly not focused on fixing the problem," he said.

Military officials who have been in charge at the Walter Reed facility offered apologies during the hearing.

Major General George Weightman was the commander before he was dismissed last week.

"It is clear [that] mistakes were made, and I was in charge," he said. " We can't fail one of these soldiers, or their families, not one, and we did."

Lieutenant Gen. Kevin Kiley, left, and Major Gen. George Weightman testify before House subcommittee hearing at Walter Reed Medical Center, 5 March 2007
Weightman's temporary replacement, Lieutenant General Kevin Kiley, called steps to simplify bureaucracy urgent, and had this apology for conditions at Walter Reed.

"I am personally and professionally sorry and I offer my apologies to the soldiers, the families, the civilian and military leadership of the Army and Department of Defense, and to the nation," he said.

Documents Congress is examining include an internal Army memo indicating high-level officials at Walter Reed and the U.S. Army Medical Command were warned in 2006 that a process of privatizing positions dealing with patient care, and an influx of wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan, threatened to overwhelm the system.

Republican Congressman Tom Davis says the Pentagon was unprepared for the number of wounded, currently at least 22,000 from Iraq alone.

"The Pentagon somehow failed to anticipate that deploying unprecedented numbers of reserve component troops into combat would produce an unprecedented flow of casualties," he said. "As a result, the defense department has been scrambling ever since to lash together last century procedures and systems to care for returning citizen soldiers."

Controversy about conditions for wounded veterans comes as President Bush faces sharply eroded public support for the war in Iraq, and opposition to new troop deployments.

White House spokesman Tony Snow was asked by reporters Monday what specific steps the president and others are taking.

"What he has been doing is making sure that people take a good look to find out what this situation is," he said. "No excuses, get the facts, get it fixed."

The president asked Congress for $87 billion for the Veterans Administration for 2008. He said that military health care spending has gone up by 83 percent since 2001.

While the Walter Reed scandal puts pressure on all members of Congress to come up with a solution, it also poses challenges for majority Democrats.

Before last November's mid-term congressional election, they accused Republicans of short-changing military veterans in the government budget.

Facing a tight budget situation, Democrats must now determine how to respond to long-standing flaws and correct deficiencies in the nationwide military health care system.